Failed New York Governor is clueless on crime.

Hochul has tried to frame her slip in the polls, amidst soaring crime in the state, as being nothing more than fear-mongering by Republicans.

In a recent appearance, she outright dismissed the crime fears of New Yorkers saying that a few high-profile crimes have “created a sense of fear in people’s minds.”

But in addition to the rise of violent crimes in the state, the progressive drug policies of the radical left, supported by Hochul, have devastated neighborhoods overcome with drug-addled zombies.

Late last year, failed former New York Mayor Bill Deblasio created sanctioned “shooting galleries” where drug addicts can use any drug they want inside the safe haven sites.

In 2021, Hochul signed the following into law as part of a ‘harm reduction’ package claiming they were aimed at reducing drug-related overdose deaths across New York State:

The new laws:

Decriminalized public possession and sale of hypodermic needles, and also lifted the cap on how many needles a pharmacy could sell
Expanded the roster of crimes that drug addicts could commit to entering treatment programs and gave judges the option of mandating treatment in lieu of jail time
Decriminalized “opioid antagonists” like Narcan that reverse opioid overdoses
Created an online directory of opioid antagonist distributors
Established substance abuse recovery programs for inmates in state and correctional facilities

And now communities in New York are paying the price.

The New York Post reports:

The real-life horror show plays out daily in the neighborhood’s gritty streets where The Post witnessed dozens of raving, hunched-over junkies commandeering East 126th Street — now the home of a controversial public-injection site — as drug dealers hovered nearby like vultures.

Others along Park Avenue down to East 114th Street have been spotted nodding out, splayed on the sidewalk, and injecting themselves in the neck or through jeans in broad daylight.

“I almost hope a Republican governor wins, so that way they come and knock this all out,” said community developer Derrick Taitt, referring to Tuesday’s general election. “The Democrats have done nothing for us. Nothing!”

Republican candidate for Governor, Lee Zeldin, has taken the lead in the polls in the lead up to Election Day.

The post Leftist Drug Policies Led By NY Gov Kathy Hochel Destroy New York appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe Biden traveled to Westchester County, New York Sunday evening to deliver remarks at a Democrat campaign event.

He had no idea what he was saying. He had no idea where he was.

Biden got heckled.

Then he tripped over his own feet.

With just two days to go until a high-stakes midterm election, Joe Biden confirmed he is for “no more drilling.”

“No more drilling. There is no more drilling. I haven’t formed any new drilling,” Biden said to the climate change protester.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) clapped and supported Biden’s war on domestic oil.

VIDEO:

Biden to what is presumably a climate protester in the audience:

“No more drilling. There is no more drilling. I haven’t formed any new drilling.” pic.twitter.com/mXBB2Kn1j6

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 7, 2022

Will the White House walk back this statement too?

A few days ago Joe Biden said he was going to shut down all coal plants across the US.

The White House attempted damage control and tried to ‘clarify’ Biden’s statement after major backlash.

The post Two Days Before High-Stakes Midterm Elections, Joe Biden Confirms He is For ‘No More Oil Drilling’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

100 Percent Fed Up reports- On Monday, Federal Judge Kenneth Hoyt held True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht and True the Vote investigator Gregg Phillips in contempt of court over their refusal to identify a confidential informant who helped them obtain information that led to the discovery and, later, evidence that the E. Lansing, MI based election software company Konnech was storing election-related data on servers in China.

(Click HERE to donate). These two American heroes and warriors who are bravely fighting to ensure our elections are free and fair and unable to be stolen are in the midst of fighting six lawsuits related to their work to expose voter fraud in America.

Earlier today, Gregg Phillips posted a photo of himself wearing an orange jumpsuit in a federal prison on Truth Social.

He also posted an update:

5th Circuit still considering emergency release.

This may be the first time in U.S. history that Americans have been jailed in a federal civil defamation suit.

Tonight, Catherine Engelbrecht announced that they have been released from federal prison, and for now, they are free!

Praise the Lord!!!!

Catherine released the following statement upon their release:

Those who thought that imprisoning Gregg and I would weaken our resolve have gravely miscalculated. It is stronger than ever.

The right to free and fair elections without interference is more important than our own discomforts and even this detention, now reversed by a higher court.

We are profoundly grateful for that. We will continue to protect and defend those who do the vital work of election integrity, and we will make sure that their findings become a matter of public record.

– Catherine Engelbrecht, True the Vote

Here is a portion of their appeal:

This contempt proceeding is founded on Defendants1 grossly misunderstood public statements by Plaintiff and the district court, having to do with both (1) Chinese Server Data – sensitive data one defendant, Gregg Phillips, witnessed on a TV monitor in a Dallas hotel room in late January 2021 – which data is the sole subject of Plaintiff’s claims of computer fraud – and (2) Election Breach Information – summary information about the resulting election system vulnerabilities, all publicly available, which Defendants wished to convey to the public as a warning.

As a result of its misunderstanding of Defendants’ modestly technical descriptions, Plaintiff has misunderstood this case to be in some way about hacking, or the Computer Abuse and Fraud Act, or about disclosure of sensitive data (whether of Plaintiff or individuals). All of these assumptions are incorrect. But the district court perpetuated that misunderstanding in ordering Defendants to make disclosures to Plaintiff that were alternatively impossible, inappropriate, or legally irrelevant.

Based entirely on its demonstrably flawed assumptions, Plaintiff inappropriately ex parte obtained a TRO seeking discovery outside standard civil procedure.2 Perhaps goaded by Plaintiff’s characterizations of this case as being about “election denialism”, the Court took the unusual step of issuing a TRO that compelled affirmative relief from Defendants (1) in the absence of any evidence from Plaintiff, (2) based on demonstrable mischaracterizations of Defendants’ public statements, (3) without permitting Defendants to proffer all relevant evidence, and (4) based on the incorrect conclusion that a person who witnessed Chinese Server Data not shown to belong to Plaintiff somehow “accessed” a “protected computer” of Plaintiff. Highlighting the hazards of ex parte hearings, the district court uncritically accepted Plaintiff’s counsel’s incorrect statement that Defendants “admitted hacking and theft of financial and other sensitive personal data of purportedly 1.8 million U.S. poll workers allegedly from a Konnech protected computer.”

Following the ex parte appearance by counsel for Konnech on the same day it filed its Complaint and motion for injunctive relief, whose merits and supposed urgency were both based on Plaintiff’s grave misconceptions about the types of information Defendants had spoken of, this Court issued the TRO, which holds, in pertinent part, that the defendants are enjoined from:
– “accessing”, “using”, or “disclosing” “Konnech’s protected computers” and data; or
– deleting or destroying same,
Defendants pledged to comply with this portion of the order soon after. But
the TRO also compels Defendants to disclose:
– the identity of any individual involved in “accessing Konnech’s
protected computers”, – the manner, means and time of “accessing” such computers, and
– the identity of any individual to have received said data.

In a hearing on October 6, the court forced Defendants’ prior counsel to reveal to Plaintiff, in open court and against their protests, the name of one of the confidential informants to the FBI who happened to be in the Dallas hotel room. Defendants subsequently disclosed information responding to the remainder of the court’s order, substantially complying with the order and omitting only to publicly name a second confidential informant (“the Second Informant”) (1) who was not alleged to have “accessed” any computers in this case, let alone Konnech’s, (2) whom Plaintiff had failed to establish had relevant evidence, and (3) whose personal safety the district court said it did not care about.

On October 27, 2022, at a show cause hearing the Court held Defendants in civil contempt for failing to identify the third of three individuals. Aside from the fact that the individual in question had not “accessed” a “protected computer” known to belong to Konnech, Defendants’ hesitation in disclosing another confidential informant was due, in part, to their attempts to grapple with the nature of Plaintiff’s and the court’s misunderstandings, in part because Defendants were concerned about blowing the cover of confidential informants to the FBI and putting them at personal risk, and in part because their original counsel. But their hesitation was not, as Plaintiff and the court characterized it, contemptuous.

Crucially, in the October 6 hearing, Plaintiff misrepresented the disputed nature of their conclusions about Defendants’ statements, saying, “[T]here is Fifth Circuit precedent that says that the Court can consider a preliminary injunction without live testimony so long as there is no genuine issue of material fact.” DOC 30 TR at 9 (emphasis added). But there is a genuine issue of material fact here — consistent mischaracterizations by Plaintiff’s counsel about the nature of what Phillips saw (American poll worker data on a server located in China) and what Defendants have said they would do (report the fact of such data being breached and available in China – not the data itself).

1. Defendant Phillips Witnessed a Portion of the Chinese Server Data

Defendant Phillips witnessed, on a TV monitor in a Dallas hotel room, enormous amounts of data (he was told 350TB) on a server located in China, some of it including sensitive data on American poll workers.3 Also present were the person who accessed the data, Michael Hasson, whose name was revealed during the hearing of October 6, and the third individual. Some of the data appeared to have come from, or been taken from, Plaintiff Konnech.

But while the court’s order to show cause is entirely about this data, unrebutted testimony shows that Defendants did not themselves access the Chinese Server Data, did not download or copy it, do not otherwise possess it, and have never stated they would reveal it to anyone.

a. Defendants Did Not Download the Chinese Server Data
Q. Did any — forgive me if I get the terminology — but did any downloading occur in your presence in that hotel room when the — whatever was up on the TV screen was up on the TV screen — was any access happening?
A. No.
Doc 47 TR, p.32 (Phillips answering).
b. No Defendant Has a Copy of the Chinese Server Data
Q. Do you have, in your possession, a copy of this electronic information that was displayed on that screen in the hotel room in Dallas?
A. No, sir.
Q. Does Ms. Engelbrecht have a copy?
A. No.
Q. Does True The Vote have a copy?
A. No, sir.
Q. Does anybody associated with True The Vote have a copy?
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you ever have a copy of the electronic data on your computer or otherwise in your individual possession?
A. No.
Doc 47 TR, pp. 33-34 (Phillips answering).
On October 6, Defendants’ prior counsel had already informed the court that the Chinese Server Data was something Phillips had only seen, and did not possess:
MR. BREWER: Your Honor, seeing it [data] and possessing it [data] are two different things.

THE COURT: Well, it may not be and it may be.
c. DefendantsDidNotWitnessHackingorMeansof“Access”
In unrebutted testimony, Defendant Phillips also made clear that what he saw
in the hotel room was not “accessed” at that time. Rather, he was shown the results of the access on the TV monitor:
Q. What, if anything, was your impression on the temporal relationship — that is the time relationship between when you walked into the hotel room and whenever whoever it was downloaded the information or data that appeared on the TV monitor that you saw?

A. It took about 20 minutes to get his computer hooked to the television screen. He had a problem with the cord that needed to hook into the hotel screen. Once he pulled it up, he went straight to his files that he was showing me.
Q. Was it your impression that information was actively being retrieved at that moment in the hotel room, or was it your impression that that had already been done, and he was showing you something that had been done in the past?
A. I think it was being done in the past. He certainly wouldn’t have been — there wouldn’t have been enough bandwidth at the hotel to download that kind [350TB] of data.

Defendants have also made clear exactly why they could not help Plaintiff –
as it demanded in its supposedly urgent motion for a Temporary Restraining Order – with its serious security problems. Because the uncontroverted testimony is that Phillips did not know how the Chinese Server Data had been accessed:

THE WITNESS: I don’t know how it was accessed. I know it was accessed because I saw it, and I subsequently learned that the information had become important to the FBI. [As to] when, given the size of the data that I understand was downloaded, it was somewhere in the 350-terabyte range, and was downloaded over approximately three months in the first quarter of 2021.

Defendants Did Not Provide the Chinese Server Data to Anyone
In unrebutted testimony, Defendants also made clear who gave the Chinese
Server Data to the FBI – and it was not Defendants:
Q. And so how was the data sent from Mr. Hasson to the FBI?

A. They have a method to transmit large chunks of data directly to them. Q. What’s that method?
A. I didn’t do it. You’d have to ask Mike.
Q. Were you involved in it being done?
A. No.
Q. Did you see it being done? A. No.
Q. Who told you it was done? A. The FBI.
Doc 47 TR at 54-55 (statement of Gregg Phillips).
In the same podcasts Plaintiff has cited without understanding, Phillips has
also explained unrefuted information about the China-based server that should have prevented the district court from attempting to make Defendants responsible for Plaintiff’s own security problems in China: “Important keynote here, guys, for everyone … We didn’t steal anything. They left it open. The database was a MongoDB database that they left open. … There were no tools used to break in.”

The second type of information, or data, in this case is about the basic fact of the breach of American poll workers’ data, which we will call Data Breach Information. This is the only information or data that Defendants “accessed”, possessed, or wanted to disclose.

2. Data Breach Information

The Data Breach Information includes the general fact that sensitive data on American poll workers was being stored on a computer server located in China. The Data Breach Information consists of the publicly available fact that election-related domain names hosted by Konnech on behalf of American cities were being hosted on the same China-based server as its American poll worker data, as was Konnech’s URL app.konnech.com (meaning that any data that ran through its apps ran through the insecure server in China), and, apparently, what appeared to be websites for the Chinese election system (e.g., 2dmeeting.com and 2dmeeting.cn).
Exhibit 1 shows a screenshot from the publicly available website Binary Edge, which provides information on computer servers around the world. It shows the server information for Konnech-owned domain name Vote4Fairfax.com, a website run on behalf of Plaintiff’s client Fairfax County, Virginia, which Defendants confirmed was registered to Konnech before the domain name’s ownership information (aka WHOIS information) was recently concealed. The Binary Edge screenshot, taken before someone changed the server to one located in the U.S, reveals several key facts:
• The screenshot was taken sometime shortly after December 29, 2020.
• The domain name Vote4Fairfax.com was hosted in China, specifically, on Unicom, one of three “backbones” of the Chinese Internet, which is owned
by the Chinese government.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Unicom
• The computer server has IP address 101.66.244.52.
• The same server hosted many other domain names – and their data –
operated by Konnech on behalf of its American clients, such as the city of Boston (Vote4Boston.com), the city of Hillsborough (Vote4Hillsborough.net), and others.
• Server 101.66.244.52 also hosted apps.konnech.com, as well as all the data on applications used by Konnech customers who access apps.konnech.com Exhibit 2 shows that the same domain names, as well as Konnech’s PollChief.com website and a few more domain names that Konnech operates on behalf of clients in Detroit and Lake County, have been belatedly moved to a server based in the United States. See Ex. 2 (accessed on November 1, 2022). It is this Data Breach Information that Defendants said, in their podcasts and The Pit event and other media, they wished to reveal to the public. This information does not belong to Plaintiff, was not accessed from them, is not defamatory, and is within Defendants’ First Amendment rights to speak about.

3. The Missed Opportunities in the Court Below

In fact, had the district court subjected Plaintiff’s testimony to cross-examination, consistent with due process, the court could have determined whether Plaintiff does indeed own the above-named domain names, and whether it was Plaintiff who moved the domain names from the server in China to the one in the United States. If Plaintiff does own the domain names or did move them from an insecure server in China to a server in the United States, then its entire motion for contempt, and its argument that it needs immediate injunctive relief in the form of Defendants helping it to understand its server’s “breach”, could have been denied. Why? Because Plaintiff knew its information was on a server in China, and Plaintiff did not require the names of private individuals in order to secure its data, as Plaintiff insisted in its overheated and ex parte Motion for TRO. Lacking such urgency, the court’s holding of the ex parte proceeding was itself inappropriate. And it made no sense for the court to order Defendants to tell Plaintiff what it already knew, nor to arbitrarily incarcerate them for a good-faith disinclination to disclose the names of confidential informants who could have told them what they already knew: that they were hosting their domain names and data on a server in China.
The court did not allow Defendants to explain the crucial distinctions at issue here. It did not appear to appreciate the distinctions – admittedly somewhat technical in nature – when Defendants offered them. Witness the court’s questioning of Phillips regarding the data – the Chinese Server Data – of American citizens he saw that night in the Dallas hotel room:
THE COURT: And you saw that there were bank accounts? THE WITNESS: There were bank accounts.
THE COURT: You saw the names of the individuals?
THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.
THE COURT: You saw their Social Security numbers? THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.
THE COURT: And you then said: We’re going to post this on a public domain?
THE WITNESS: No, sir. There is two different datasets.
THE COURT: Well, I’m not — I don’t care about the datasets. You know what I am describing.
14
“It’s unrelated,” Defendant Phillips began, because he did in fact know what the court was describing, but the court cut him off before he could explain the crucial distinction. See Doc 47 TR 5at 97, lines 3-17 (emphasis added).
This was not Defendants’ only attempt to ensure the court was informed about the fundamental issues — and what they had and had not said they witnessed, possessed, or would disclose – before it issued the contempt citation:
THE COURT: Okay. Do you recall making a statement on the podcast to the effect that you were going to create a website and would load the — this data that you saw onto the website for the people who would want to visit that site?
Note, again, that Defendants’ podcast and website both relate to the open- source, publicly available Election Breach Information, not the Chinese Server Data.
THE WITNESS: No, sir. That’s not true.
THE COURT: I’m asking you. This is what you said — or what your podcast said.
THE WITNESS: My podcast was referring to something we called the ripcord. The ripcord was related to an app called Open.INK, I-N-K. We were going to put the — we do all sorts of other research. We do a lot of open-source research, meaning Googling around and trying to find things. But we also do geospatial research.

The post BREAKING: Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips RELEASED From Prison – Here’s The Latest… appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On Monday Rep. Janel Brandtjen, Chair of the Assembly on Campaigns and elections sent out an election fraud alert.

Rep. Brandtjen received three authentic military ballots to her home addressed to “Holly,” a woman who has never lived there.

Brantjen believed this was part of a scheme to steal votes in Wisconsin.

The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on this 2020 voter fraud scheme in several battleground states where military ballots mysteriously went almost entirely to Joe Biden.  We posted evidence that this occurred in Michigan, Arizona and Georgia.

On Thursday Wisconsin radio host Dan O’Donnell broke the news that Kimberly Zapata, the deputy director of the City of Milwaukee Election Commission, was fired for committing election fraud.

Kimberly Zapata

Milwaukee Elections Commission Director Claire Woodall-Vogg, who we have spotlighted several times at The Gateway Pundit for her questionable actions, says she believes that Zapata was attempting to point out that military ballots can be requested and sent out without a photo ID or even voter registration.

On Monday, Brandtjen alerted law enforcement that someone had sent military ballots in the names of people who don’t exist to her home in what Brandtjen believed was an effort to alert her to how easy it is to commit vote fraud using military ballots.

— Dan O’Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 3, 2022

Milwaukee Elections Commission Director Claire Woodall-Vogg says she believes that Zapata was attempting to point out that military ballots can be requested and sent out without a photo ID or even voter registration through the public https://t.co/D6Nnq5tHWd website.

— Dan O’Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 3, 2022

More… Democrats say Zapata was trying to prove how easy it was to request fake ballots. And this was all a conspiracy theory. Even though it worked EXACTLY like Zapata said it would.

Kimberly Zapata has since lawyered up and is facing serious charges.

On Sunday night Rep. Brandtjen sent out this update.  Brandtjen and several military veterans are petitioning courts to verify active military status for our brave men and women in uniform.

State Representative Janel Brandtjen, Chair of the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, along with several military veterans, have petitioned the courts to verify active military status for our brave men and women in uniform. The move comes after Brandtjen received three absentee military ballots with invented names at her home last week.

“Now that we know just how easy it is to illegally acquire military ballots, I’m asking the courts to confirm active military status until we can close these loopholes. We all want to protect our military members from having their valor stolen in such a despicable fashion,” Brandtjen said. “Of course we will make sure every legitimate military ballot is counted, and we will not let bad actors steal their votes,” Brandtjen added.

Rep Brandtjen remains optimistic that the courts will act swiftly to verify active military status.

Here is Rep. Brandtjen’s lawsuit filed on Friday November 4, 2022.

Military Ballots Complaint – Rep. Janel Brandtjen 11-4-22 by Jim Hoft on Scribd

The post Wisconsin Representative Janel Brandtjen Petitions Courts to Verify Active Military Ballots After Leading Democrat Caught Sending Out Fraudulent Military Ballots appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

During his latest rally in Miami, Florida, Trump cleared the air regarding his comments about DeSantis during his rally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania.

As the Gateway Pundit reported yesterday, while speaking to a packed out crowd in Pennsylvania, Trump called the Florida governor “Ron DeSanctimonious”.

Trump calls Ron DeSantis “Ron DeSanctimonious” pic.twitter.com/XLaTd70sGM

— Luke (@Strongthirsty) November 7, 2022

Many Trump supporters were surprised the 45th president would take a shot at DeSantis just a couple of days before Florida’s gubernatorial election.

Well, it appears Trump has changed his mind for now about DeSantis because, during his rally in Miami, Trump urged Floridians to vote for DeSantis.

Trump was quoted saying “The people of Florida are going to reelect the wonderful, the great friend of mine, Marco Rubio to the United States Senate. And you’re going to reelect Ron DeSantis as your governor of your state.”

WATCH:

Trump: “You’re going to re-elect the wonderful Marco Rubio to the United States senate and you’re going to re-elect Ron DeSantis as your governor.” pic.twitter.com/HSkr7DE92E

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 6, 2022

For now, it appears Trump has backed down from taking any more shots at DeSantis but that could all change if DeSantis runs for the Republican nomination.

Trump’s original frustration with DeSantis stemmed from the Florida Governor endorsing Joe O’Dea for Colorados’ Senate just days after O’Dea told CNN “that he would “actively” campaign against Trump.”

Despite all the side drama, conservatives are relieved Trump put away any feelings he has towards DeSantis personally and set them aside for one goal and that’s to keep Florida red.

The post “Great Friend of Mine” – Trump Clears the Air About DeSantis Drama at Miami Rally (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump was in Miami today holding a rally for the GOP candidates running for office in the state in the midterms. 

President Trump held another rally today, this time in the sunny state of Florida.  The President was joined by many fellow GOP candidates running for office in the state.  One notable exception was Ron DeSantis who is running for governor.

Yesterday, at a rally in Pennsylvania, President Trump labeled DeSantis, “Ron DeSanctimonious”.

President Trump Takes Major Jab At DeSantis During PA Rally – Pundits Weigh In

Today the President shared:

“If you support the decline and fall of America, then you must go out and vote for the radical left Democrats.”

The Americans at the Trump rally were not any of those who want to destroy the country like the Democrats are doing today.  The people at this Trump rally want to make America Great Again.

President Trump did urge Floridians to reelect Marco Rubio for Senator and Ron DeSantis for Governor.

The post “If You Support the Decline and Fall of America, Then You Must…Vote for the Radical Left Democrats.” – President Trump at Huge Rally in Miami Today appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Bidens ruin everything.

The Houston Astros won the World Series over the Phillies in game 6 Saturday night.

MLB All-Star Lenny Dykstra blamed Jill Biden’s appearance at game 4 for the Phillies’ loss.

“Better luck next time, #Phillies. Might be better off rolling out that red carpet for Lenny Dykstra instead of Dr. Jill Biden. (9 hits in 3 games since she showed up.)” Lenny Dykstra said on Saturday night.

Better luck next time, #Phillies. Might be better off rolling out that red carpet for Lenny Dykstra instead of Dr. Jill Biden. (9 hits in 3 games since she showed up.)

— Lenny Dykstra (@LennyDykstra) November 6, 2022

“Since the doctor showed up, the #Phillies went 0-3 with 9 total hits. #TheCooler” Dykstra said with a photo of Jill Biden.

Since the doctor showed up, the #Phillies went 0-3 with 9 total hits. #TheCooler pic.twitter.com/xC2nYUMOuI

— Lenny Dykstra (@LennyDykstra) November 6, 2022

“Phillies were leading the World Series 2-1 until the no-hitter changed the momentum for the Astros.” Fox News noted.

“[Jill] Biden on Wednesday joined the Stand Up to Cancer tribute at Citizens Bank Ballpark in the middle of the fifth inning. She arrived to the stadium just before the tribute, which occurred after the Astros scored five runs in the inning to take a 5-0 lead. The team didn’t look back from there.” the outlet reported.

The Astros threw a World Series no-hitter last week in front of Dr. Jill.

Dr. Jill jinxed the Phillies.

HISTORY MADE.

The @astros are only the second team in MLB history to throw a #WorldSeries no-hitter! pic.twitter.com/xFGB6VaCdo

— MLB (@MLB) November 3, 2022

The post MLB All-Star Lenny Dykstra Blames Jill Biden’s Appearance at Game 4 For Phillies’ World Series Loss Against Houston Astros appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe Biden traveled to Westchester County, New York Sunday evening to deliver remarks at a Democrat campaign event.

He had no idea what he was saying. He had no idea where he was.

During his brief remarks, Old Joe got heckled.

Then he tripped and almost fell.

Biden’s handlers have dragged him around the country in a last-minute campaign blitz to help Democrat lawmakers with their elections.

Joe Biden is almost 80 years old.

He just cannot keep up with a grueling schedule.

“Whoops! Stepping on a – uh anyway!” Biden said.

It’s past his bedtime.

VIDEO:

Whoa! Careful there, Joe! pic.twitter.com/4FiqPilkEa

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 6, 2022

The post It’s Past His Bedtime: Joe Biden Trips, Almost Falls at Democrat Rally in New York (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Here we go…

It’s not even Election Day yet, and Democrats are already stealing votes from law-abiding Americans.

100 Percent Fed Up – Democrats are expected to be shellacked in most national, state, and even local races in the mid-term elections on November 2. And while Democrat leaders are making up false narratives about violence on Election Day and falsely accusing Republicans of putting too many safeguards in place that will ultimately disenfranchise voters, stories about Democrats committing voter fraud are already beginning to trickle in, creating anxiety again, about the outcome of critical elections, especially in swing states.

On Friday, James Zheng, a Democrat poll worker in Carmel, Indiana, was kicked out of an election office after he was accused of telling voters how to vote and even voting “straight Democrat Party” for one person who asked for assistance.

Hamilton County election administrator Beth Sheller told Fox News Digital that the inspector at the polling place where the Democrat poll worker was ejected learned of two separate incidents that may constitute electioneering and election interference.

Chalkboard Review reports – According to the election administrator, Beth Sheller, of Hamilton County, IN, Zheng was accused by local voters of telling black voters “…not to vote for the racist candidates outside” indicating a group of pro-parent candidates (beyond the electioneering boundary) running for school board in the Carmel-Clay school district. Two of the voters complained about this act of electioneering to the pro-parent school board volunteers outside, who reported this to the local inspector.

The inspector then learned of a second incident, this one involving potential election interference. Sheller said the poll worker was assisting a voter with an electronic ballot and pressed the “straight Democrat ticket” option during the explanation. She said the voter was then confused about how to change the selection and raised the issue with another nearby poll worker. That worker resolved the issue, allowing the voter to cast a legitimate ballot, and then informed the polling inspector of what happened, Sheller said.

Hamilton County GOP chairman Mario Massillamany argued the incident raised questions about how many voters had been confused after receiving help from Zheng but had not gone so far as to complain to other officials.

The post Dem Poll Worker Caught Cheating! Was Marking Voter’s Ballot “STRAIGHT DEMOCRAT”- Telling Black Voters Who to Vote For appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Keisha Lance Bottoms, a former mayor of Atlanta and now a senior adviser for public engagement at the White House, claims that “misinformation” allegedly spread by his political opponents is to blame for Biden’s disastrous performance in office.

In an interview with CBS’s “Face the Nation,” host Margaret Brennan cited some recent comments from members of the Democratic Party that the Biden regime didn’t do a good job of publicizing their achievements.

“The president said just a few days ago that he has passed so many good things, but people haven’t realized how good they are yet,” Brennan said.

“Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin said, the truth is Democrats have done a poor job of communicating our approach on the economy. DNC adviser Cedric Richmond told CBS the president his message of what he’s been able to accomplish has not gotten out there. Hillary Clinton just said, the work done by Democrats is impressive, but we got to get that message across more effectively. If the policies are so good, why is communicating them such a problem?”

“Well it’s been a very difficult couple of years,” Bottoms replied.

Bottoms then blame ‘misinformation’ from Republicans for the Democratic Party’s catastrophic policies, despite the fact that the party owns all of the media.

“We’ve been in the midst of a pandemic, there’s been a lot of misinformation flooding the airwaves. We see it in ways not just on television, but we’re seeing it through YouTube, we’re seeing it on other social media platforms. So it is more difficult to get the message out.”

Watch the video:

Top Biden adviser Keisha Lance Bottoms says people just don’t realize how much Biden has done because there’s “a lot of misinformation flooding the airwaves” on TV and YouTube. pic.twitter.com/t0YiQqU5E2

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 6, 2022

The Biden administration did nothing good for the country.

The democrats delivered:

Record high gas prices
Defunding the police
Calling parents terrorists
Millions of illegals
Grocery shortages
CRT
Recession
Billions to Ukraine
Baby formula shortages
Violent crimes
Afghanistan disaster
Open border
High taxes
Grooming our kids
Fentanyl deaths
Cost of food
Federal spending
Experimental Vaccine Mandate

The post Top Advisor Keisha Lance Bottoms Blames Biden’s Dismal Failures on ‘Misinformation’ from Political Opponents (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.