Tag

Slider

Browsing

Hillary Clinton’s lawyers on Monday filed a motion demanding Donald Trump pay Clinton’s legal fees after a Bill Clinton judge tossed the RICO lawsuit over the Russian collusion canard.

President Trump filed a federal RICO suit in Miami, Florida in March against Hillary Clinton and others over the Russia collusion hoax orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in 2016 to undermine Trump’s candidacy and derail his presidency.

Trump asked for treble damages of expenses and losses of more than $24 million.

In April President Trump requested the Clinton-appointed judge overseeing his Russiagate case against Hillary Clinton and others be removed from the case due to obvious conflicts of interest.

President Trump earlier had sued a number of individuals and former officials for their actions related to the Russiagate hoax and attempted coup of his administration.

Somehow this case was assigned to Clinton-appointed Judge Donald Middlebrooks and Judge Ryon McCabe.

Middlebrooks refused to recuse himself from the case despite an obvious conflict of interest being that he was appointed by Hillary Clinton’s husband, Bill Clinton.

Last month Judge Donald Middlebrooks DISMISSED President Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and several FBI-DOJ crooks who manufactured the Russia Collusion hoax to influence the 2016 election and then to bring down his presidency in a government coup.

Judge Middlebrooks also threatened Trump’s attorneys with “consequences” for daring to file the case against Hillary Clinton.

Now Hillary wants Trump to pay up.

“A reasonable attorney would never have filed this suit, let alone continued to prosecute it after multiple Defendants’ motions to dismiss highlighted its fundamental and incurable defects,” Clinton’s attorneys wrote.

The Hill reported:

Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is asking a federal court to order former President Trump to pay her legal fees over a suit he filed alleging she and others engaged in a conspiracy to undermine his 2016 campaign with accusations of Russian collusion.

In a motion filed on Monday, Clinton’s attorneys cast Trump’s suit — which was dismissed by a federal trial court in September, a move the former president has appealed — as a “political stunt” and argued it met the threshold for the court to impose sanctions.

Under federal law, a judge can require attorneys who “unreasonably and vexatiously” multiply court proceedings to pay excess costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of their actions.

“Plaintiff’s suit was unwarranted on the facts, unsupported by the law and imposed substantial burdens both on Defendants and this Court,” Clinton’s attorneys argued. “Despite being alerted to the many deficiencies in the initial Complaint by one round of motions to dismiss, Plaintiff and his counsel pressed forward on an Amended Complaint that fixed none of the problems.”

Trump attorney Alina Habba vehemently denied Clinton’s allegations in a written statement, returning accusations that the former presidential candidate filed the motion for political purposes.

“This motion, conveniently filed one week prior to election day, is nothing more than a thinly-veiled attempt to score political points,” she continued. “This motion is particularly inappropriate, given that the our client’s case will soon be reviewed by the Eleventh Circuit. We will oppose this motion and trust that the Court will see through this ruse.”

The post Hillary Clinton Demands Trump Pay Her Legal Fees After Clinton Judge Tosses RICO Lawsuit Over Russia Collusion Hoax appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The criminal complaint of David DePape leaves more questions than answers.

Jim Hoft drafted the following summary of the David DePape charging document.  In the charging documents, the Justice Department, via interviews with Paul Pelosi and DePape lay out the government’s version of events (TGPsummary):

The two men did not know each other. DePape broke into the house via a rear door using a hammer and went upstairs looking for Nancy Pelosi. He found Paul Pelosi in bed and told him he was looking for Nancy. Not finding her home he told Paul he would wait for her. He let Paul go to the bathroom where Paul made a 911 call, which apparently DePape overheard. The two went downstairs where Paul opened the door when police knocked. Paul was not attacked until police arrived when he was apparently beaten unconscious by DePape with a hammer while police confronted the men. DePape had a bag with zip ties, rope, tape, gloves, another hammer and a journal.

DePape said his plan was to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage to get her to tell the truth and let her go if she did tell the truth, but if she lied he would break her kneecaps.

The document claims DEPAPE was prepared to detain and injure Speaker Pelosi when he entered the
Pelosi residence in the early morning of October 28, 2022. DEPAPE had zip ties, tape, rope, and
at least one hammer with him that morning.

Why do we not know how many hammers he had with him when he entered the home and why more than one hammer?

Special Agent Stephanie Minor created the report based on “my experience and training as an FBI Special Agent also forms the basis of the opinions and conclusions set forth below.”

Why would the FBI assign a low-level agent to this case?  Doesn’t this involve the US Speaker of the House?  Ms. Minor has only been a Special Agent since 2019.

Ms. Minor says: “I have participated in several investigations of individuals that committed criminal acts in furtherance of ideological goals, to include militia violent extremists.”

So is she one of the FBI Agents involved in the Jan 6 sham?

On October 28, 2022, at 2:23 a.m., San Francisco Dispatch received a 9-1-1 call from Paul Pelosi (“Pelosi”) located at the Pelosi residence in San Francisco, California. Pelosi stated words to the effect of there is a male in the home and that the male is going to wait for Pelosi’s wife. Pelosi further conveyed that he does not know who the male is. The male said his name is David.

Didn’t Paul Pelosi say David was his friend?  Why was this left out of this document?

When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm. Pelosi greeted the officers. The officers asked them what was going on. DEPAPE responded that everything was good. Officers then asked Pelosi and DEPAPE to drop the hammer.

There is no mention of who opened the door.  Initial reports were that someone else was there.  This is also the first time we hear that DePape said everything was good. 

DEPAPE pulled the hammer from Pelosi’s hand and swung the hammer, striking Pelosi in the head. Officers immediately went inside and were able to restrain DEPAPE. …After officers asked DEPAPE if he had an ID on him, DEPAPE said it might be in his backpack on the back porch and later stated his backpack was near the broken glass. When officers removed DEPAPE from Pelosi’s residence, police body worn camera footage showed a glass door that appeared to be laminated glass, broken near the door handle.

If Paul Pelosi is over 80, wouldn’t the hammer to the head kill him?  What were the men wearing at this time?  Initial reports were that one or both were in their underwear.  Why is this not clarified? 

Also, DePape was injured and taken to the hospital along with Pelosi.  Why is there no mention of his injuries?  

Also, the body cam shows a glass door that appeared to be laminated glass broken near the door handle.  But this door was not open.  The doors four or five feet away were open.  DePape could not fit in the small hole in the glass that was broken.  How did he get in?  Also, if this was laminated glass and it was broken by DePape, how many times did he have to hammer the glass before it broke?  Why was this not captured by the CCTV cameras, motion detectors and security at that time?

Witness 1, who saw an individual in all black, carrying a large black bag on his back, walking near the Pelosi residence where Witness 1 was parked. Witness 1 was working private security at an address nearby. Witness 1 then heard what sounded like banging on either a door or car and then heard the sirens within a minute or two.

Where was the security at the Pelosi house?  Surely the US Speaker of the House who is worth millions obtained while she was Speaker has security of her own.  Why did they not hear this? 

This is also the first time that we heard there were sirens.  Why would the police turn on their sirens when it was a well-person check?

Pelosi was interviewed by SFPD Officer Ariane Starks in the ambulance during transport to San Francisco General Hospital. Pelosi stated he had never seen DEPAPE before.  Pelosi was asleep when DEPAPE came into Pelosi’s bedroom and stated he wanted to talk to“Nancy.” … Pelosi stated that his wife would not be home for several days and then DEPAPE reiterated that he would wait. Pelosi was able to go into the bathroom which is when he was able to call 9-1-1. Pelosi stated that when the officers arrived, that was when DEPAPE struck him with the hammer.

Why was it omitted that Pelosi called him David?  How did he know that?  Pelosi also called him his friend in his call with 911. 

Why did not the security system or person not identify a person walking around the Pelosi home in the middle of the night?  How did he know where the bedroom was located?

[Next, the document discusses the interview with DePape where he apparently claimed he wanted Pelosi to tell the ‘truth’.  This is not defined.]

DEPAPE stated that he broke into the house through a glass door, which was a difficult task that required the use of a hammer.

Again, how many times did DePape hit the glass door without anyone noticing?

DEPAPE stated he wanted to tie Pelosi up so that DEPAPE could go to sleep as he was tired from having had to carry a backpack to the Pelosi residence.

He wanted to take a nap?  How did DePape get there?  Why was this not discussed?

While talking with each other, Pelosi went into a bathroom, where Pelosi grabbed a phone to call 9-1-1… DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand…DEPAPE stated that he pulled the hammer away from Pelosi and swung the hammer towards Pelosi. DEPAPE explained that Pelosi’s actions resulted in Pelosi “taking the punishment instead.”

[This story now begins to read like the fraudulent and fake Steele dossier used to frame President Trump that we now know was an entire lie.]

So according to this story, DePape knew that 911 was called.  He apparently allowed that.  DePape also allowed Pelosi to open the door and then grab DePape’s hammer. 

The third person that the police mentioned over the weekend is no longer part of the story. 

[Next the FBI claims that they examined the garage that DePape lived in for the past two years.]

The FBI never mentions that DePape is an illegal alien.  

The FBI never mentions that his wife and he are connected to nudist activities. 

The FBI never mentions that his wife has tweets where she berates President Trump. 

The FBI never mentions DePape’s injuries and why he is still in the hospital or how he was injured.

The FBI never discusses websites associated with DePape.

This appears to be red meat for the media just like the bogus and now-known fraudulent Steele dossier only two weeks from the election. 

The Pelosis and the FBI are a disgrace to this nation. 

Below is the Scribd document of the Criminal Complaint against David DePape.

David Depape Complaint and Affadavit by Jim Hoft on Scribd

 

The post More Questions Than Answers on Pelosi Attacker David DePape’s Charging Documents appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Twitter is playing more tricks ahead of next Tuesday’s General Election. Today, it was reported that Trump-Endorsed Arizona Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem’s Twitter account was suspended without cause.

The Gateway Pundit reported that Elon Musk and Twitter reached a deal on Thursday, and Musk now owns the platform.

BREAKING: Elon Musk Officially Owns Twitter – Immediately Fires CEO Parag Agrawal, CFO and Legal Head Vijaya Gadde

But it appears the rogue Twitter employees are still censoring conservatives in order to influence this year’s election.

Mark Finchem posted a screenshot from Twitter on President Trump’s TRUTH Social app that said, “after careful review, we have determined your account broke the Twitter rules.”

Mark Finchem said, “they are trying to put their thumb on the scales of this election” in a message to former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis.

Finchem sent the following message to Ellis earlier today, and Elon Musk replied, “looking into it.”

Looking into it

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 31, 2022

Kari Lake War Room shared the following message, urging voters to vote for Mark Finchem and Blake Masters to stop this election interference and hold Big Tech accountable.

Big Tech silenced @RealMarkFinchem nine days before the election.

Rep Finchem is running for Secretary of State against Adrian Fontes, an incompetent crook.

We need you to do two things.

Vote Finchem to secure our elections.

Vote @bgmasters to hold Big Tech accountable.

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) October 31, 2022

Brick Suit also chimed in to bring attention to this issue.

This is unprecedented.
Twitter locks the account of @RealMarkFinchem which prevents him from posting for a week.

A flare was sent up to Elon, and he’s already answered it and is looking into the matter.

That Elon is on the case so quickly is amazing. https://t.co/7BXXxLUnom

— Brick Suit (@Brick_Suit) October 31, 2022

Finchem tweeted an hour later, thanking Elon Musk and others for their support and spreading the word.

We are back! Thank you @elonmusk for stopping the commie who suspended me from Twitter a week before the election. Twitter is much better with you at the helm. Thank you @MediaRightNews1 @JennaEllisEsq @KariLake @Brick_Suit & others for spreading the word! #AZSOS https://t.co/TfdJNnnuIm

— Mark Finchem #JustFollowTheLaw VoteFinchem.com (@RealMarkFinchem) October 31, 2022

This is also happening to Conservative Arizona State House candidate Christian Lamar, and his account has not yet been reinstated.

Catturd….@christianllamar is running in AZ and was locked out of Twitter this morning. Can you help us get this info to Elon.

— MATT 2024 Can’t Come Soon Enough (@ks122085) November 1, 2022

All Arizona Patriots should tweet Elon Musk to reinstate Christian Lamar and other conservative candidates who’s elections are being targeted by Twitter.

Why is the only conservative POC candidate in Arizona locked out? @christianllamar @elonmusk help

— AZSuburbs (@noprezzie2012) November 1, 2022

It looks like Elon Musk may need to fire a few more rogue employees.

The post Elon Musk Restores Mark Finchem’s Account After Twitter Suspends Him 8 DAYS Before General Election appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In July 2021  The Gateway Pundit reported that Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, the man who invented email, was able to uncover Twitter’s “partner support portal.”

Dr. Shiva discovered that Twitter built a special portal offered to certain governmental entities so that government officials can flag and delete content they dislike for any reason, as part of what they call their “Twitter Partner Status.”

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai ran for US Senate in Massachusetts as a Republican and made allegations of voter fraud on Twitter.  These tweets were then deleted by the far-left tech giant.  Later it was discovered that they were deleted at the direction of government employees of the Massachusetts Secretary of State’s office. 

Discovering this, Dr. Ayyadurai filed a federal lawsuit by himself, alleging that his federal civil rights were violated when the government silenced his political speech in order to affect an election.

In late July 2021, Dr. Shiva released another explosive report.

Dr. Shiva revealed how election officials and government actors work together to coordinate with social media platforms to silence speech in America.

Via Vashiva.com – click here for high resolution image.

Dr. Shiva previously uncovered for the first time the existence of a “Trusted Twitter Partnership” between the Government and Twitter.

Dr. Shiva described this discovery in his amended legal complaint filed in July 2022.

But it is not just Twitter that has a special relationship with government bureaucrats, Democrat operatives and business elites.

Investigative journalists Lee Fang and Ken Klippenstein released a report this week on how The Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, DOJ, Democrat operatives, and business elites are working with Facebook to silence dissenting voices.

In 2016 The Gateway Pundit was the 4th most influential conservative website on Facebook.  In 2017 Facebook cut off our traffic.  Years later Facebook created its “fact-checkers” to use as an excuse to shut down conservatives and independent journalists who challenged their lies and fabrications.

Lee Fang reported on The Intercept on The Truth Cops.

There is also a formalized process for government officials to directly flag content on Facebook or Instagram and request that it be throttled or suppressed through a special Facebook portal that requires a government or law enforcement email to use. At the time of writing, the “content request system” at facebook.com/xtakedowns/login is still live. DHS and Meta, the parent company of Facebook, did not respond to a request for comment. The FBI declined to comment.
HS’s mission to fight disinformation, stemming from concerns around Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election, began taking shape during the 2020 election and over efforts to shape discussions around vaccine policy during the coronavirus pandemic. Documents collected by The Intercept from a variety of sources, including current officials and publicly available reports, reveal the evolution of more active measures by DHS.

According to a draft copy of DHS’s Quadrennial Homeland Security Review, DHS’s capstone report outlining the department’s strategy and priorities in the coming years, the department plans to target “inaccurate information” on a wide range of topics, including “the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, racial justice, U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the nature of U.S. support to Ukraine.”

“The challenge is particularly acute in marginalized communities,” the report states, “which are often the targets of false or misleading information, such as false information on voting procedures targeting people of color.”

The inclusion of the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan is particularly noteworthy, given that House Republicans, should they take the majority in the midterms, have vowed to investigate. “This makes Benghazi look like a much smaller issue,” said Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., a member of the Armed Services Committee, adding that finding answers “will be a top priority.”

How disinformation is defined by the government has not been clearly articulated, and the inherently subjective nature of what constitutes disinformation provides a broad opening for DHS officials to make politically motivated determinations about what constitutes dangerous speech.

Fang and Klippenstein leaked out the Facebook Content Request System.
It’s still posted online.

The system is effective. Facebook and Democrats used this model against The Gateway Pundit.

THIS IS HUGE: Oregon Government Orders Facebook to Remove Gateway Pundit Article on Republican Ballot Scandal – Facebook Complies — Despite Hundreds of Confirmed Testimonies

It’s how the left controls speech in America today.

And now we have proof that both Twitter and Facebook are working with Democrat leaders to censor conservatives.

The post DISCOVERED: Facebook and Twitter Private Portals Where Democrats, Government Officials and Corporate Elites Meet to Ban Unwanted Conservative Content appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A recent pro-abortion video pushed by death-cult enthusiasts including Hillary Clinton and California Governor Gavin Newsom includes an image of macy Petty.

Petty appears in the ad falling to the ground with tears flowing.  The ad places the word “sad” over Petty to imply the pro-life activist was distressed at the recent Supreme Court decision in June regarding Roe v. Wade.

Twitter/Macy Petty

But this is not true.

In fact, according to Petty’s Twitter account, those are happy tears flowing.  Petty responded to Clinton’s tweet sharing the ad saying, “Hey Hillary, I’m the girl crying in this video.  I am pro-life and those are HAPPY tears because I just witnessed a MIRACLE!”

Hey Hillary, I’m the girl crying in this video. I am pro-life and those are HAPPY tears because I just witnessed a MIRACLE! @HillaryClinton @GavinNewsom #prolife https://t.co/rlnEhdB6yg

— Macy Petty (@macypetty0416) October 20, 2022

Macy Petty spoke with The Christian Post to discuss her outrage at her inclusion in video sharing:

“I’m part of a generation of pro-life activists,” she said. “My mom worked at a pregnancy center, and my grandma started one. So it’s in my blood. And I was just so grateful to be there to witness it because there are so many people who were in the fight before me who didn’t get to witness it.”

The pro-life activist said she was “outraged” when she saw her image and how the emotions she felt that day were being twisted and misused in an attempt to convince people to vote for abortion.

Petty also responded by writing a letter to Newsom, Clinton and the Prop 1 campaign, requesting they remove her from the video and apologize.

She believes the campaign received the letter because her image has been removed from its most recent ad. However, the original video that featured her and was shared by the former secretary of state and Newsom is still available and being shared on social media.

She maintained that Newsom, Clinton and the creators of the Prop 1 campaign video portrayed her in an “evil light” and “distorted [her] emotions as part of [their] political game.”

“You selected the portion in which I fell to my knees in tears. At this moment, I witnessed a miracle,” the pro-life activist added. “I was overwhelmed.”

“As I continued to witness history, I pondered how lucky I was to witness such an event. I thanked the Lord for this decision and for opening my eyes to the evil of abortion. This is what brought me to tears.”

Petty followed up on her original tweet to Clinton and Newsom with an open letter shared on the platform:

To the Yes on Prop1 Campaign and its supporters including, but not limited to, Hillary Clinton and Gavin Newsom: In your #yesonprop 1 campaign video, you included a clip of me, Macy Petty, crying in front of the Supreme Court. In the full video, it is obvious I am crying tears of joy upon the announcement of the Dobbs decision. I am holding a “Students for Life” banner and am with friends who are also holding pro-life signs. In your campaign video, you portrayed me in an evil light and distorted my emotions as part of your political game.

You selected the portion in which I fell to my knees in tears. At this moment, I witnessed a miracle. I was overwhelmed. As I continued to witness history, I pondered how lucky I was to witness such an event. I thanked the Lord for this decision and for opening my eyes to the evil of abortion. This is what brought me to tears. You have manipulated these emotions. You have disrespected me as a woman and an engaged member of society. Although I am distinctly pro-life in the full video, you consciously chose to portray me as pro-abortion. In the video, you note “we” are”sad.”

I am not “we.” I strongly oppose Prop 1. Do not include me in your efforts to further manipulate women and violently take life from the most vulnerable and innocent among us. Earlier this week, many shared this video of me. The list included both Hillary Clinton and Gavin Newsom. I demand you remove me from the Yes on Prop 1 campaign video and all further pro-abortion materials. I will not stand by as you use my face, my tears, and my passion in a way that promotes demonic activity.

Could you not find an early 20-year-old who was truly sad about the Dobbs decision? You must manipulate the film of an obvious opponent to your campaign? Perhaps this is the indicator that America is truly pro-life. Please remove me from all of your campaign videos and promotional materials immediately. If you truly value democracy and diversity of opinion, you will halt this blatant manipulation and apologize for the indecency.

Respectfully,
Macy Petty

. @HillaryClinton @GavinNewsom #prolife pic.twitter.com/8goIfMmrns

— Macy Petty (@macypetty0416) October 20, 2022

In an interview with the pro-life California Family Council, Petty shared her feeling about Prop1 and the dishonest way her emotions were distorted  to manipulate the narrative.

The post Pro-life Woman Featured in Anti-abortion Ad Shared By Hillary Clinton Is Outraged the Death Cult Is Using Her Image to Push Their Propaganda appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe and Jill Biden Monday evening hosted local children of firefighters, nurses and police officers at the White House for a Halloween celebration.

Dr. Jill looked tacky (as usual) in her fairy costume and purple wig.

Jill Biden and Joe Biden’s granddaughter Naomi Biden dressed as fairies Monday night.

Jill wore a purple wig and Naomi wore a pink wig.

.@FLOTUS and granddaughter Naomi Biden are dressed as fairies for the White House Halloween event. pic.twitter.com/os7EDEQfxg

— Akayla Gardner (@gardnerakayla) October 31, 2022

Tacky.

WATCH:

Pres. Biden and first lady Jill Biden welcomed a few astronauts, a couple of Buzz Lightyears and even Michael Myers to the White House for Halloween. https://t.co/8yRhcWosNJ pic.twitter.com/rY1HdSDQvW

— ABC News (@ABC) October 31, 2022

Biden took advantage of the trick-or-treating event and sniffed a baby.

He just can’t help himself.

A father holding his baby walked up to Joe Biden and Biden immediately went in for a sniff.

Why does Biden keep doing this? pic.twitter.com/ySFtfiBrmw

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) October 31, 2022

Dr. Jill and Joe both got lost as they tried to exit stage left.

WATCH:

The post Tacky. Tacky. Tacky. Jill Biden Dresses as Fairy with Purple Wig For White House Halloween Event (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe and Jill Biden Monday evening hosted local children of firefighters, nurses and police officers at the White House for a Halloween celebration.

Biden took advantage of the trick-or-treating event and sniffed a baby.

He just can’t help himself.

A father holding his baby walked up to Joe Biden and Biden immediately went in for a sniff.

Why does he always do this?

VIDEO:

Why does Biden keep doing this? pic.twitter.com/ySFtfiBrmw

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) October 31, 2022

Biden also did a little dance as children asked him for candy.

Creepy weirdo.

WATCH:

Is Joe Biden OK? pic.twitter.com/YKGXojfNb9

— Danny De Urbina (@dannydeurbina) October 31, 2022

The post He Can’t Help Himself: Joe Biden Sniffs Baby at White House Halloween Celebration (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Justice Department announced federal charges against David DePape, 42, in the attack last Friday on Paul Pelosi, the 82-year-old husband of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), at the couple’s San Francisco home.

Kristinn Taylor reported on the announcement earlier.

DePape is being charged with assault on a family member of a U.S. official and one count of attempted kidnapping of a U.S. official, Nancy Pelosi, who was not home at the time.

In the charging documents, the Justice Department, via interviews with Paul Pelosi and DePape lay out the government’s version of events (TGPsummary):

The two men did not know each other. DePape broke into the house via a rear door using a hammer and went upstairs looking for Nancy Pelosi. He found Paul Pelosi in bed and told him he was looking for Nancy. Not finding her home he told Paul he would wait for her. He let Paul go to the bathroom where Paul made a 911 call, which apparently DePape overheard. The two went downstairs where Paul opened the door when police knocked. Paul was not attacked until police arrived when he was apparently beaten unconscious by DePape with a hammer while police confronted the men. DePape had a bag with zip ties, rope, tape, gloves, another hammer and a journal.

DePape said his plan was to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage to get her to tell the truth and let her go if she did tell the truth, but if she lied he would break her kneecaps.

“DEPAPE also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other Members of Congress there were consequences to actions.”

Both men were interviewed by law enforcement, with DePape reportedly speaking after being read his Miranda rights.

According to today’s version of events, David DePape broke into the home unnoticed, went to the bedroom where Paul Pelosi was sleeping where they had a discussion before Paul slipped into the bathroom to make a call.

The court documents then say David DePape was tired and wanted to take a nap.

Michael Shellenberger reported on this oddity.

“DEPAPE stated he wanted to tie Pelosi up so that DEPAPE could go to sleep as he was tired from having had to carry a backpack to the Pelosi residence.”

Wow! So his true motive was to sleep!

Because what psychotics say should always be taken literally.https://t.co/cG6tskfjjX pic.twitter.com/c6Hb4BRcRn

— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) October 31, 2022

The drug-induced homeless conservative kidnap plotter broke in the home – Then just wanted to take a nap.

The post Criminal Complaint: Pelosi Attacker David DePape Went Up to the Bedroom – Was Tired, Wanted to Take a Nap appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky on Sunday tested positive for Covid AGAIN in a ‘rebound case’ after taking Paxlovid.

Fully vaxxed and boosted Walensky tested positive for the China virus last week just one month after she received her latest booster.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and the globalist elites said the vaccine would stop transmission. It didn’t.

They said the vaccinated could quit wearing a mask. They couldn’t.
They said the vaccinated would not get sick. They did.
They said the vaccinated were not going to die. Another lie.

Walensky tested positive AGAIN just one week later after she started a course of Pfizer’s antiviral drug Paxlovid.

Fox News reported:

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky tested positive for COVID-19 again on Sunday, 10 days after initially contracting the virus.

Walensky, who is up to date on her vaccines, started a course of Pfizer’s antiviral drug Paxlovid when she first started developing symptoms on Oct. 21.

Her symptoms improved and she tested negative, but she tested positive again in an apparent rebound case on Sunday.

Walensky is the third high-profile government official to experience a rebound COVID-19 case after taking Paxlovid, which was approved in December for patients at risk of severe infection.

Walensky is in isolation and working remotely, the CDC said.

The post Fully Vaxxed and Boosted CDC Director Walensky Tests Positive For Covid AGAIN in *Rebound Case* After Taking Paxlovid appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

British scientists have reportedly deliberately created deadly hybrid Covid strains in a university lab in London.

Twenty scientists at the Imperial College in London infected hamsters with mutant viruses including strains of the original coronavirus and parts of Omicron or Delta, according to the Daily Mail.

One of the scientists involved in the experiment is a member of the British government’s SAGE advisory panel.

Imperial College maintains the tax-payer-funded study was safe and that scientists adhered to British regulations while conducting the trial and denies that the work constitutes gain of function.

Dr. Richard Ebright, a molecular biology expert at Rutgers University, warns the experiment could ignite another pandemic wave.

“At least four labs on two continents now have construed non-natural, lab-generated viruses that retain the high immune escape of Omicron and acquire higher severity than Omicron and that, as such, are reasonably expected to increase transmission or pathogenicity in humans,” Ebright noted on Twitter.

At least four labs on two continents now have constructed non-natural, lab-generated viruses that retain the high immune escape of Omicron and acquire higher severity than Omicron and that, as such, are reasonably expected to increase transmission or pathogenicity in humans. https://t.co/jKeDXXNY2G

— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 28, 2022

“This is insanity. Both in terms of the redundancy and waste. And especially, in terms of the risk of triggering a new pandemic wave upon accidental release of the lab-generated viruses — a risk exacerbated by the fact the lab-generated viruses are present in multiple locations,” he added.

This is insanity. Both In terms of the redundancy and waste. And, especially, in terms of the risk of triggering a new pandemic wave upon accidental release of the lab-generated viruses–a risk exacerbated by the fact the lab-generated viruses are present in multiple locations.

— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 28, 2022

Scientists should be prohibited from creating viruses in labs without oversight, Ebright warns.

“This should be a wake up call,” he noted. “If the world wishes to avoid new pandemics caused by lab-generated pathogens, then it is urgently necessary to restrict-high-risk, low benefit research that creates enhanced potential pandemic pathogens and to implement effective national oversight with force of law.”

If the world wishes to avoid new new pandemics caused by lab-generated pathogens, then it is urgently necessary to restrict high-risk, low-benefit research that creates enhanced potential pandemic pathogens and to implement effective national oversight with force of law.”

— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 28, 2022

The study by scientists at the British university comes after scientists at Biocontainment Laboratory at Boston University conducted a similar experiment, creating a deadly new hybrid Covid strain with an 80 percent kill rate in mice by combining Omicron and the original Wuhan Covid strain.

When mice trialed in the study were infected with the virus comprised of spike proteins extracted from Omicron, the structure that binds to and invades human cells,  and the original Covide strain, 100 percent of them died.

The researchers at Boston University claim they were investigating whether the spike protein on the Omicron variant, which make Omicron the most transmissible Covid variant, “is also behind the virus having a particularly mild effect on infected hosts, with most suffering only slight illness,” the Daily Mail reports.

“The team behind its creation announced that as well as ‘inflict[ing] severe disease’ it also ‘robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity’, indicating that the recombinant virus retained the most dangerous properties of its parents.,” the publication notes.

The National Institute of Health is a major funder of the Biocontainment Laboratory at Boston University.

Dr. Emily Erbelding, a director at the NIAID division of microbiology and infectious diseases, claims that she was unaware of the experiment was being conducted by researchers at the university and only learned of the details from news media reports.

According to a new interim report published by the Senate Committee on Health last week, Covid-19 is likely a result of a “research-related incident”  and not a “zoonotic spillover, in which animal diseases cross the species barrier and infect humans.”

“While precedent of previous outbreaks of human infections from contact with animals favors the hypothesis that a natural zoonotic spillover is responsible for the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in the COVID-19 pandemic was most likely the result of a research-related incident. This conclusion is not intended to be dispositive. The lack of transparency from government and public health officials in the PRC with respect to the origins of SARS-CoV-2 prevents reaching a more definitive conclusion. Should additional information be made publicly available, and subject to independent verification, it is possible that these conclusions would be subject to review and reconsideration.”

The post How Is This Legal? Scientists In London Lab Just Created A Mutant Super Strain of COVID And It’s Reportedly Lethal appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.